Trotz Corona sind wir weiter für Sie da. Dank voll digitalisierten Prozessen und Akten können wir sowohl bestehende Mandate als auch neue Anfragen aus dem Homeoffice weiter bearbeiten.

Nutzen Sie unsere Beratung per Telefon, E-Mail und Videokonferenz.
Seit mehr als 33 Jahren

Forwarding company is liable without effective customs authority even for EUSt

In its ruling of 20.10.2016, the Munich Finance Court ruled that a freight forwarder who makes a customs declaration for another carrier without effective power of representation can be claimed as a debtor of import sales tax. Customs representatives should therefore always ensure proper authorisation by their customers.

Customs representative without effective customs authorisation

It was a forwarding company that made a customs declaration for another company based in the Union to import carpets from Turkey. It acted as fiscal representative. However, she was not involved with the transport. At the EU’s external border, the goods were dispatched to Germany under the external TIR carnet transit procedure. In Germany, the transit procedure was terminated. The goods were then transported to the Netherlands via France. As the company for which the forwarding company submitted the customs declaration was already in liquidation, there was no effective customs authority.

Forwarding as debtor of import sales tax

Who is liable for import sales tax (EUSt) is determined in accordance with § 13a Para. 2 in conjunction with § 13a Para. 2. 21 (2) UStG according to the regulations for customs duties. Under Article 5(4), second subparagraph, of the Customs Code (CC), now Article 19(1), second subparagraph, of the Union Customs Code (UCC), a person who indicates that he is acting as a customs representative but does not have power of representation is considered to be the declarant himself. According to the judgement of the FG München, it is thus also a customs debtor under Art. 201 para. 3 subparagraph 1 sentence 1 CCC, now Art. 77 para. 3 subparagraph 1 sentence 1 CCC, and thus also a debtor of the EUSt, even if the freight forwarder has been deceived as to the existence of an effective power of attorney and the existence of an intra-Community follow-up delivery.

No exemption due to intra-Community delivery

Nor would there be any tax exemption under § 5 (1) No. 3 UStG, according to which the import of goods is tax-free if they are used by the debtor of the import turnover tax directly after the import to make an intra-Community delivery. In this case, the freight forwarder did not benefit from this advantage, since at no time did he have control over the goods but merely accepted the customs declaration. It could therefore not use the goods to make deliveries.

Forwarding companies that handle customs formalities for their customers should be aware of this high tax risk and take appropriate precautions.

Our customs lawyers can advise you on the tax risks involved in handling customs formalities.

Get 15 minutes free initial consultation now!+49 40 369615-0or send an e-mail


Lawyer Dr. Tristan Wegner

Your consultant

ABC-Straße 21
20354 Hamburg
T +49 (0) 40 / 36 96 15 0
More interesting articles on this topic


How to handle (long-term) supplier declarations

The supplier’s declaration is one of the most frequently issued commercial documents in the ...


Dual-use regulation – what you need to know for export

What does the EU Dual-Use Regulation actually regulate and what do exporters need to know? What are ...


Brexit and customs – companies need to know this now

On the roadshow “Brexit und Zoll“, customs informed the economy about changes in the upc...